tstart: 1634619048.1797
EU EU summit Paweł Jabłoński Poland Rule-of-law V4 News

Analysis: EU funding isn’t tied to rule of law issues despite claims otherwise

Polish portal TVP Info explains why there is no direct link between the payment of EU funds and the rule of law issue in the settlement agreed at the EU summit in Brussels

editor: REMIX NEWS
author: TVP Info

As a result of European Union summit, Poland is set to receive €160 billion in grants and loans, however, some opposition politicians and commentators have argued that this money will be tied to rule of law compliance.

The resolution of the summit does refer to the issue in clauses 22 and 23 of the text. The two clause read:

Clause: 22: The Union’s financial interests shall be protected in accordance with the general principles embedded in the Union Treaties, in particular the values of Article 2 TEU. 

The European Council underlines the importance of the protection of the Union’s financial interests. The European Council underlines the importance of the rule of law.

Clause 23: Based on this background, a regime of conditionality to protect the budget and Next Generation EU will be introduced. In this context, the Commission will propose measure in case of breaches for adoption by the Council by qualified majority. 

The European Council will revert rapidly in the matter.

This, in reality, means that any such process to tie rule of law to funding would begin with the European Commission proposing a mechanism for protecting the rule of law and submitting it for approval to the Council of Ministers of the European Union, a body made up of ministers of European Affairs.

The Council of Ministers may approve such a proposal by a qualified majority, which totals 55 percent of member states or member states representing 65 percent of the EU’s total population. But such a measure can be blocked by at least four member states as long as the blocking group represents more than 35 percent of the total population of the EU — the Visegrad Four countries of Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia, would not be enough for this purpose.  

But the third step would be decisive here.

The matter will have to return to the European Council, the body in which all member states are represented by their heads of government. This is the body where decisions are made that must be reached on the principle of unanimity. That means that should an attempt be made to punish Hungary, Poland or any other country through a rule of law mechanism, the matter would have to return to the European Council where it could be blocked by just one member state.